Twilight Zone’s ‘Deaths-Head Revisited’: Aesthetic PTSD, Archetypal Nazis and the Question of the War Criminal – Part 1/3

This blog entry is part one of three: the purpose of this series is to explore how perpertrators of war crimes are treated after the war in various points of genre television. This blog focuses specifically on The Twilight Zone (referred to in this blog as TZ) episode ‘Deaths-Head Revisited‘ as it focuses specifically on the question of how to deal with war criminals post-war. The second blog will focus on the 1981 episode of Magnum, P.I., ‘Never Again… Never Again’. The final entry focuses on a 1993 episode, ‘Duet’, in the science fiction programme Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Each blog will examine how those who committed crimes of war are treated within these television episodes. As always, spoilers are ahead. 

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 17.07.39.png

‘Deaths-Head Revisited’ – Twilight Zone
Season 3, Episode 9
Aired: 10 November 1961
Teleplay by: Rod Serling
Directed by: Don Medford

It is not an exaggeration to say that TZ is preoccupied with war, in particular WWII. Out of the 156 episodes of the classic programme, a vast number of episodes deal with war in one form or another: ‘King Nine Will Not Return’, ‘The Thirty-Fathom Grave’, ‘The 7th is Made Up of Phantoms,’ The Encounter’ all deal with survivor’s guilt and post-war identity. ‘Time Enough At Last,’ ‘The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street’, and ‘The Shelter’ all deal with the looming threat of nuclear war, and ‘He’s Alive’ (an episode I will write on further) explores the rise of fascism and America. ‘A Small Talent for War,’ ‘Judgement Night,’ ‘Third From The Sun,’ ‘The Last Fight’, ‘Two’, ‘The Passersby’, ‘Still Valley’, ‘A Quality of Mercy’ each have war as a main theme within the stories.

The reasons for this are hardly straight forward, but I’d like to address several potential reasons here. Firstly, the programme premiered in 1959 – a mere 14 years after the end of the Second World War ended. Secondly, the American involvement in the Korean War (1950-1953) was still a fresh wound and, unlike the Second World War, the Korean War was seen as a ‘bad’ war that America should not have been involved with (much like the Vietnam War (1961-1968). Thirdly, the Cold War, starting in 1947, saw an increase in perceived threats from Cuba with Fidel Castro’s rise to power and push for Communism (and therefore an increased panic for seeing Communism as a threat to America) and the Communist insurgent movement in  North Vietnam (the Viet Cong), foreshadowing the threat that would ultimately be used to justify the American involvement in the Vietnam War. In short, America in the late 1950s was suffering from the ghosts of fresh past wars and the uneasy looming spectre of feared nuclear war. 

Moreover, Rod Serling himself was a war veteran of WWII, one who was, by many accounts, dealing with what would be recognised today as PTSD. Born to a Jewish family, he enlisted for military service as a paratrooper the morning after his high school graduation in 1943. He was transferred to a demolition platoon, and eventually had a reputation for going against orders. Serling received several medals, including the Purple Heart, but even after being discharged in 1946, Serling found civilian life tainted by his military experiences, saying ‘I was bitter about everything and at loose ends when I got out of the service. I think I turned to writing to get it off my chest.’  His father also passed away soon after he was discharged, adding to Serling’s struggles with depression and trauma.

Lastly, and perhaps more immediate, it could be argued that this episode is inspired by the kidnap and the trial of the German Nazi SS Oversturmbannführer, Adolf Eichmann, a major organiser of the Holocaust. In May of 1960, the Israeli Security Service captured Eichmann in Argentina, delivering him in Jerusalem for trial in an Israeli court for his crimes in WWII. During the trial, Eichmann was enclosed in a bulletproof glass booth. Eichmann was found guilty and sentenced to death, executed on 1 June, 1962 by hanging. This event is something that will further explored in the third instalment of this series focusing on DS9‘s ‘Duet’. However, in terms of the TZ, this event most certainly could have impressed Serling enough to question how justice could ever truly be given for the events of the Holocaust.

With this context, it is understandable that so much of Serling’s work would come with anti-war sentiments. Twilight Zone was, in effect, a way for him to work out issues of his own PTSD through a safe and displaced medium: science fiction. More than a few of Serling’s episodes can be viewed as a sort of aesthetic working of his own PTSD, and this episode, perhaps more than most.

Although I have a great deal more to say about Twilight Zone and war, as well as Serling’s impact on genre television (and will, at some point), I want to turn attention specifically to the episode, ‘Deaths-Head Revisited’ (‘DHR’). I would argue that ‘DHR’ is certainly one of the most significant episodes of TZ; furthermore, I do not believe it is overstating matters to argue that this episode is one of the most significant episodes of any television programme in the history of television in relation to war. 

Conflict, criminality and atrocities are never an easy topic to tackle, especially in television. Limited by framework of the show, time, network restrictions, expectations of the audience, and even budget, discussing what should happen to those perpetrators of war crimes — in particular, those who have faced no negative consequences for their involvement in war crimes — is a difficult task. Magnum, P.I., and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, with WWII so far in the past, both approach war crime and war criminals with more hesitancy – perhaps even delicacy, attempting to show more shades of grey between good and evil. 

With Serling’s own history, still reeling from the recent trauma of WWII, this episode of TZ is anything but subtle. As a programme, TZ has plenty of subtle social commentary, but this episode is sophisticated, relentless and unapologetic in its attitudes toward war, war crimes and those who committed them.

‘DHR’ makes no attempts to soften the blows: it has every intention of breaking not just the main character of the episode, but the viewer as well. On numerous occasions, I have shown this episode to others. In every single case, the person I have shown it to has broken down in tears. Several times I have been asked to pause the episode for a few minutes so that they may take a break from the intensity, but no one has ever asked me to turn it off. In every single case, the person I have shown it to sits in silence for about 10 minutes after the episode finishes. After one viewing, a friend told me, ‘well, that was a fucking punch to the face, I’m going to have an emotional black eye for a month. That is the best thing I’ve ever seen. And I never want to see it again. I hate you for making me watch it. Thank you.’ 

The plot to ‘DHR’ is, in fact, very simple: Guther Lutze, a former S.S. Captain of the first concentration camp, Dachau, returns to the camp to relive his ‘glory’ days. As TZ was filmed in monochrome, the episode is visually stark and grey-scale. As nearly every scene is set at a former concentration camp, the mis-en-scenes for most of the episode are primarily in darker rooms with little light. Some very interesting camera work helps sell the episode, particularly toward the very end. It is the acting and directing that really showcases this story. 

Like DS9‘s ‘Duet’, discussed in part three of this blog series, the primary action is between two people, in this case, Becker (played laconically by Joseph Schildkraut) and Lutze. On screen for every moment of the episode, Oscar Beregi plays Lutze: although he was fantastic in a variety of other programmes (Mission: Impossible and Untouchables, in particular), Beregi is probably most famous for his Twilight Zone appearances, and this episode in particular. The character of Lutze could have very easily gone into caricature, as he is the perfect trope of the archetypal Nazi. As Zack Handlen argues, however, ‘Beregi is saddled with the almost impossible task of creating a larger than life symbol of evil who is still recognisably human. He succeeds; Lutze is vile, condescending, and snivelling by turns, but he’s distinct and specific enough to avoid caricature.’

The episode follows Lutze as he checks into a hotel in Bavaria, returning to the town of Dachau. Serling’s voice over tells us that 17 years have passed, and the shadow of the Holocaust still rests heavily on this town. 

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.17.57.png

As Lutze speaks fondly of the concentration camp up the hill, the woman running the Inn he checks into is aghast and tells him ‘most of us would like it burned to the ground.’ Unlike many TZ episodes, there is no surprise ‘twist’ in the plot in the end: it is clear from the beginning that something will happen to Lutze in punishment for his ‘nostalgic’ trip up to Dachau. Rod Serling’s opening monologue leaves no guess as to what to expect in the episode: Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 16.55.50.png

As Lutze walks through the disused camp, he gleefully remembers himself shouting at those interned in the camp, a sadistic smile often creeping across his face, caught up in a nostalgia intentionally designed to make the viewer squirm. 

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.19.30.png

Things take a turn when Alfred Becker, still clad in the prisoner uniforms given to the Jews in the camp,  appears, welcoming Lutze back to the camp.

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.20.18.png

Lutze recognises him, and they exchange awkward pleasantries: 

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 20.47.05.png

Lutze begins to hear noises throughout the compound, and reacts uneasily. He bristles when Becker calls him ‘Captain’, arguing that he is not a soldier anymore.

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 17.29.58.pngThe long-used defence, ‘I did as I was told’, is something that is directly interrogated in a variety of post-conflict narratives, but here this is, in fact, used as evidence against Lutze as Lutze jumps nervously from the continued sounds throughout the compound. Becker, in a calm and even detached tone, tells Lutze,Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 17.36.32.png

Lutze offers half-hearted apologies, essentially blaming Becker for not being able to let the past stay in the past: ‘I had hoped that with the passage of time, sanity would have returned – people would be willing to forget the little mistakes of the past.’ Becker balks at Lutze’s definition of ‘little mistakes’, explaining, ‘you ask too much Captain Lutze, far too much. Why not ask for the earth to stop revolving in its axis? Don’t ask the impossible… Do not ask forgiveness from those whom you have destroyed to a point past forgiveness.’ Serling is leaving absolutely no doubt to his message: no excuse, no argument, no apology is ever enough to exonerate those who took part in the Holocaust atrocities. 

The question of ‘following orders’, of being simply a cog in the war machine who ‘did what I was told’ is one that is directly addressed not just here, but also in Magnum P.I.‘s episode, ‘Never Again… Never Again’ and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’s ‘Duet’. As will be discussed in the second blog of this series, Magnum, P.I. holds the position that in war, there are no ‘little fish’ – those who claim they were ‘following orders’ are not absolved from being held accountable for the crimes and atrocities they witnessed (or took part in) in war – that anyone who stood by and watched the atrocities happen and did nothing has blood on their hands they cannot wash off. Deep Space Nine, as explored in the final blog in this series, appears to take a more forgiving position, seeming to argue that the ‘little fish’ could not have stopped what was happening and, therefore, should not be held accountable. Lutze’s insistance that it is Becker who is at fault for not letting it go is dismissed by both Becker and Serling.  

It is at this point that Becker declares Lutze is on trial for his ‘crimes against humanity’. Lutze blusters that this trial is ‘inhuman’, and tries to leave. He falls, and as he opens his eyes, he sees he is surrounded by dozens of victims:

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.22.25.png

He sits up, and the camera angle spins with him, and then pulls into close-ups of the audience:

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.22.29.png

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.22.39.png

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.24.17.png

The direction in this scene is absolutely fantastic, as it manages to visually create the looming anxiety and panic that Lutze experiences – and the silent, seething rage that Becker exudes.

As Becker reads the crimes against Lutze to the jury of ghosts, Lutze becomes more less and less  composed as they go through the evidence of his trial to the jury of ghosts. He shouts and screams, and then passes out. When he comes to, Lutze is informed by Becker that the jury has reached their verdict of guilt. Lutze continues to scream and even tries to strangle Becker at one point:

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.28.53.png

But Becker is transformed into a wooden post, and Lutze suddenly finds himself outside in the compound.

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.28.58.png

It is now that Lutze’s judgement is given:

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 18.16.30.png

Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 15.31.24.png

The episode ends with Lutze being carried off, presumably to an asylum. The taxi driver who had driven him up to the camp and the doctor who had examined him wonder what could have turned him mad in only two hours, and the doctor looks around the camp bitterly, saying ‘Dachau. Why does it still stand? Why do we keep it standing?’ In the closing, Serling answers the question he himself poses:
Screen Shot 2017-04-17 at 18.22.35.pngSerling’s ‘Deaths-Head Revisited’ offers absolutes: those who inflicted unimaginable torment onto others with sadistic glee will find judgement one way or the other: for Captain Lutze, this means spending the rest of his life feeling the agony he inflicted onto others to the point of madness. But his torment is not over: for Serling, a religious man, the final and worst judgement to come to pass will be from God, presumably to suffer for an eternity in hell for his crimes. 

Certainly, out of the three programmes examined, this episode takes the harshest view toward war criminals. Due, perhaps, to the fact that it is chronologically the closest to WWII (and Serling’s own experiences as a Jewish American in the war), Twilight Zone understandably takes the most severe position regarding war criminals. ‘Deaths-Head Revisited’ is unapologetic, brutal, shocking and angry. Serling leaves no room for debate in this statement: Becker promises Lutze’s madness is not revenge, but justice – and his sentence is swift and absolute. Those who recognise the Holocaust as a mistake, such as the Bavarian woman in the beginning of the episode receives no recompense: she acknowledges the horrors not with nostalgia, but with revulsion. She faces a different kind of pain: that of the Vergangenheitsbewältigung – struggling to accept and rebuild after the damage of the Holocaust. 

However, In ‘Deaths-Head Revisited’, Serling is clear: those who, like Lutze, see the Holocaust as glorious are unequivocally and absolutely responsible and will suffer for their crimes – in one way, or another. 

This series on how war criminals are acknowledged in American genre television will continue in this three-part series: the next blog focuses on Magnum P.I., ‘Never Again… Never Again’, and examines the differences in how the war criminal is acknowledged.

‘A war is like when it rains in New York and everybody crowds into doorways, ya know? And they all get chummy together. Perfect strangers. The only difference, of course, is in a war it’s also raining on the other side of the street and the people who are chummy over there are trying to kill the people who are over here who are chums.’ – Hawkeye Pierce, ‘The Interview’.  

Background: Deep Space Nine (1993-1999)


One of the programmes I will probably focus on regularly in this blog is Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. As the politics and themes of the show are rather more complex than other shows, this is a very brief primer for those who are either unfamiliar with the programme itself, or need a refresher for context.

Deep Space Nine and War

Created just post Persian Gulf War (1990-1991) and airing during the Intervention of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-2004), this American programme utilises science fiction to make statements on culture and events like war through a futuristic lens, as science fiction, generally (and Star Trek, specifically), is known to do. For those less familiar with Star Trek in general, the two programmes on during this time, Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994) (TNG) and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine were extremely different from each other. TNG, although occasionally delving into darker material, had a tendency to focus primarily on the wonders of the universe. In TNG episode ‘Q Who’, an omnipotent being, Q, gives the TNG crew a ‘kick in our complacency’ when he shows Captain Picard an enemy that cannot be reasoned or negotiated with (The Borg). Q warns Picard,

If you can’t take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It’s not safe out here. It’s wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it’s not for the timid.

Whilst TNG certainly delved into the dangers in the universe on occasion, generally, the show focused on the ‘wonderous … treasures to satiate’ rather than the horrors. Gene Roddenberry’s dedication to Humanism meant a future that showed humans evolving beyond racism and homophobia, creating a society based not on fear and hatred, but of love and hope. TNG, in particular, explored this, showing what humans could be capable of. Generally speaking, war and xenophobia were distant memories, a dark corner of the primitive soul buried and rarely exposed. TNG, much like the original Star Trek series, was optimistic humanism, encouraging others to see a world of possibilities. In Star Trek: The Captain’s Summit (2009) for example, several of the Star Trek actors debated the legacy of the programme, concluding that it was the positivity and hope of a better future that drew people to Star Trek in the first place.

DS9, however, was a different flavour entirely: rather than occasionally touch on the ‘wonders’ of the universe, the focus was turned, instead, to that ‘bloody nose’ Q speaks of. Often considered (wholly unfairly, in my opinion) as the ‘step child’ of the Star Trek franchise, DS9, unlike Star Trek and Next Generation, often focused on repercussions and consequences of actions. For example, Kirk could make changes to an alternate universe with no consequences in the original Trek: DS9, however, is forced to face those consequences when someone comes from that alternate universe and reveals that Kirk’s changes destroyed everything entirely.

For me, this is the greatest appeal to DS9: the characters were damaged, often irreparably, by the world they lived in. In short, DS9 utilised the Gothic regularly within a franchise generally focused on hope, intellectuals, exploration and discovery. This resulted in an occasionally uneven programme, but one that arguably held some of the best Trek episodes in any of the programmes.  Ron Moore, of Battlestar Galactica, has stated that he was unable to go as ‘dark’ as he wanted with DS9 due to the general optimism and format of the Trek universe. However, the show did go darker than the other Trek shows generally, and as such, DS9 is a valuable place to locate the Gothic within Trek. As my research focuses on war and television, as I will certainly explore in further blogs, in many ways DS9 became something of the ‘anti-Trek’, focusing not on the great efforts of humanity, but on the follies and the flaws (which is why I love it, and why it is often ignored within the Trek universe).

Unlike the other programmes, DS9 was a static space station: it did not go out each week with the goal to ‘seek new life and new civilisations’ or to ‘boldly go where no one had gone before’. No, the station was primarily positioned as a political chess piece between two different entities: above the planet Bajor and next to Cardassian Space. For several decades, Bajor has been under Cardassia occupation: a brutal and totalitarian invasion, very strong links can be made between this situation and WWII (and will definitely be a full blog entry alone!).

As Bajor attempts to rebuild after the planet has been devastated for resources, the Federation has an interest in protecting Bajor. Recovering from decades of occupation and war under Cardassian rule, Bajor remains vulnerable. Deep Space Nine, a Cardassian station, is abandoned and power relinquished jointly to the Federation and Bajor. This space station is the first line of defence (as much as it is, having few weapons) against any new incursions against Bajor from the Cardassians. It is, in short, a stopgap to make Bajor feel safer and make the Cardassians a bit afraid. If the Cardassians move in on the station, the Federation becomes involved to protect Bajor. The Federation and the Cardassians previously went to war with each other many decades previously, and no-one seems keen on repeating this experience.

Many of the plots within DS9 tend toward understanding a post-war culture, devastated by war and attempting to rebuild their world. The closest approximation to this situation would be a British or American base (primarily employing Jewish immigrants and displaced war survivors) taking over the Dachau, Germany labour camp as a civilian base directly after the Second World War immediately after the war.

Many of the primary characters were themselves veterans of war: Federation Captain Benjamin Sisko (Avery Brooks) lost his wife in the battles with the Borg only a few years previously; unlike Captain Picard (Patrick Stewart), who generally remained unaffected after being taken captive by the Borg in TNG unless the plot called for it, this event created a very deep, persistent and occasionally destabilising issue for Sisko: a harshness in an otherwise gentle man. Kira, a Bajoran, on the other hand, is fresh from war, and therefore more representative of the hardened war veteran recently sent home after the war and struggling to cope with civilian life. Miles O’Brien (Colm Meaney), a veteran from the long-ago Federation war with Cardassia, also very often becomes the centre of imprisonment, torture and violence within various episodes so often that it has become something of a trope in itself (And future blogs will most certainly explore O’Brien, PTSD, Irishness, class, war and torture, as these are all areas I research in).

The station was something of a Land of Misfit Toys: each of the characters seem to struggle to cope with life on the station in some way. Odo, a changeling, is (to his knowledge) the only being of his kind: surrounded by humans, but never really able to be one, Odo is constantly on the outside looking in. What Odo fails to realise, however, is that most of the main characters on the station are the odd ones looking in. Quark, the greedy Ferengi bartender, constantly complains about the humans surrounding him – but he complained about the Cardassians when they owned the station, as well. He can’t go back to his home because he doesn’t make enough money to have respect in his society. He gets along well enough with most of the crew, but no one trusts him – nor should they. Garak, a former spy for Cardassian who has been banished from his home, forced to live surrounded by people who hate him (and I have plenty to say on Garak and Dandyism!). Garak, like Odo, is the only one of his kind near by – but they’re far too different to connect. Most of the characters on the station are, in one way or another, the outsider with no where else to go.

I could go on, but the point here is that whilst Captain Picard was taking the crew of The Enterprise to explore all the wonders of the universe, Captain Sisko and crew of Deep Space Nine station were busy trying to just cope with their living situations, often alienated by their homes and alienated from each other through politics and culture. They’re often too busy to keep peace with each other – let alone cope with the responsibilities of keeping peace outside the station. The station is situated on the cusp of two post-war cultures attempting to start again: The Federation is positioned to protect Bajor, a planet stripped of all resources, left crippled by war, from Cardassia – a people the Federation was, at one time, at war with. Cardassia, a somewhat floundering empire, over-extended, left embarrassed by war, attempting to rebuild not their cities, but their reputations. DS9 attempts to keep peace (and ultimately fails — but that’s another blog for another day) between politicised and aggressive forces in a station on the verge of falling apart.

DS9 and the Gothic: 

In a previous blog for the IGA, I wrote on how Star Trek: Next Generation experiments with Gothic tropes in ‘Night Terrors’. In this blog, I concluded that the utopian element of Star Trek hinders the Gothic from ever truly being realised to full potential. TNG makes several interesting attempts into the Gothic – and, at some point, I might revisit this. But generally speaking, I stand by my conclusion: TNG was a show that focused on the wonders of the universe, and even when dealing with the ‘bloody nose’ in the universe, in the end everything is generally reset with little to no consequence for future.

As previously suggested, however, DS9 is a Trek of a different flavour. Is it consistently Gothic? No. Does it, like other Trek series, utilise familiar Gothic tropes? Yes. Does it do so more effectively than the other Trek series? Absolutely.

As I will undoubtedly discuss ad nausea in future blogs, the majority of the episodes dealing effectively with Gothic tend to focus around Miles O’Brien. O’Brien was tortured so often in the programme that it became a running joke  that others have noticed – to the point that people have asked actor Colm Meaney why his character was so often forced to suffer. However, there are some really great episodes that are focused on other characters that are certainly worth of discussion on Gothic.



What is Khaki Gothic?



What is Khaki Gothic?

In short, Khaki Gothic is a term I use for a specific combination of Gothic, War and Comedy. I have written an article on this for Gothic Studies due out in May 2017.

In brief, ‘it is not just an intentional, explicit employment of the rhetoric and tropes that have come to be identified as “Gothic” to depict horror, but the employment of these very same qualities to simultaneously subvert that horror, temporarily giving the appearance of humour in war narratives. Because the humour is ultimately the result of a proximity to death, the Gothic maintains a permanent foothold and is never lost; through a careful application of humour, the horror evoked seems to fleetingly shift into the periphery.’

To read an earlier draft of this article, please click here:



Intro Blog

cropped-image1.jpgWell, not sure how you found yourself here, but I’m happy you stopped by.

Why am I here? Well, I have a passion for exploring TV and culture. I’m an occasional academic, writing on masculinity, fashion, Irish literature, comedy and war (and a few other things). I’m here because I probably spend a bit too much time watching television and way too much time thinking about it.

One thing I find myself thinking quite often about is how television uses war for entertainment. I can’t think of anything less entertaining than war — it’s brutal, horrific and cruel. But it’s also everywhere – films, TV, video games… Jean Baudrillard refers to it as ‘war porn’.

And yet, there has been a distinct lack of exploration in how war  is conveyed to an audience through scripted television. This is surprising, as there are literally hundreds of television programmes that explore various war settings. Perhaps one of the most famous of these programmes is the programme M*A*S*H (1972-1983), set in an army hospital during the American involvement of the Korean War (1950-1953). Other programmes worth note include Hogan’s Heroes (1965- 1971); It Ain’ Half Hot, Mum (1974- 1981); ‘Allo ‘Allo (1982-1992); Dad’s Army (1968-1977), each set in World War II; China Beach (1988- 1991), Tour of Duty (1987- 1990), focusing on the American involvement of Vietnam War (1959-1975).

The representation of war is not limited to programmes specifically set during a war, however: several programmes also explore life after war for veterans who struggle to adjust to civilian life. Most noticeable for this is Magnum P.I., which regularly uses flashbacks of the Vietnam War focusing on Thomas Magnum, a veteran who lives in Hawaii, along with three friends who are also veterans.

Genre programmes, specifically science-fiction, tends to utilise the trope of the ‘shell-shocked veteran’ who proves somewhat unstable due to PTSD from war. There’s Firefly (2002-2003), (and the subsequent theatrical feature, Serenity, 2005), focusing on a soldier, Mal Reynolds, a veteran from a futuristic war; and Battlestar Galactica (2004-2009) shows both life during a futuristic war as well as those who suffer from PTSD from the war itself. In Doctor Who (revival- 2005-present), The Doctor, as the lone survivor of the Time War, occasionally shows PTSD and instability due to his war experiences. Specific episodes address this link between war, trauma and the veteran. Other programmes, such as Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994) explore life in war, war survival and PTSD in a more limited capacity for specific episodes such as ‘The Hunted’, ‘Common Ground’, ‘Chain of Command 1& 2’, and ‘Yesterday’s Enterprise’. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, more than TNG, deals with war — ‘Duet’, for example, shows war veteran Kira trying to bring justice to a man she believes was responsible for war crimes. Although this is set in a fictional war in the future on a fictional planet, there are very intentional and specific links to be made with the prison camps and war criminals of World War II.

These are just a few areas of interest — but most striking is the fact that war, as entertainment, is such an under-researched field. Moreoever, as a Gothicist, I can’t help but notice that there are some very strong links in how many Gothic tropes are used within these programmes to represent war. It doesn’t seem to matter whether show is comedy or drama, portraying historical or fictional wars, or whether or past traumas resurfacing for veterans suffering from PTSD: Gothic tropes are used to display these experiences.

So, this blog aims to further explore how war, comedy and gothic are used together for entertainment within television, but to also give attention to how the experiences of soldiers and veterans are relayed through gothic tropes. Not every post will have such a specific focus, but generally I will try to keep it all related. Rarely, I might look at films like war films Duck Soup (1933) and Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) — but television is definitely my preferred medium.

Due to my busy schedule, I intend to post a blog once a month – however, this may be a bit over-ambitious, so forgive me if there are long delays. I shall try!

If you’re still here after reading all of that, then welcome again to Khaki Gothic!




Nice war we had. Of course, every war has its cute things. World War II had nice songs. The War of the Roses had nice flowers. We’ve got booms, they had blooms. Actually, every war has its ‘ooms. You’ve got doom, gloom, everybody ends in a tomb, the planes go zoom, and they bomb your room.’ – Hawkeye Pierce, ‘Goodbye, Farewell, Amen’ (M*A*S*H)